Profile
Geoffrey was called to the Bar in 2018 as a Bar Scholar and a Rhodes Scholar. He has a broad practice in civil and commercial litigation, with a particular interest in public law matters.
He has acted in a range of civil and commercial disputes, including in relation to shareholders’ disputes, financial markets, conflict of laws, international commercial arbitration, as well as land-related disputes and adverse possession claims. He has conducted civil and criminal trials (as led junior or as sole advocate) at various levels of courts and tribunals, and also acted as counsel in arbitration. He also has experience in advisory work in relation to regulatory investigations and compliance obligations, including in the contexts of securities, competition and anti-money laundering legislation.
He has particular experience in constitutional and administrative law, including high-profile constitutional litigation, equality and civil liberties, regulatory and licensing matters, commercial judicial review, as well as other cases involving public law issues. He is ranked in major legal directories including Chambers and Partners (2024) and Legal 500 (2022-2025) for administrative and public law. Recent quotes include:
“Geoffrey has an encyclopaedic knowledge of the law on constitutional rights and guarantees. He is not only very efficient and able to turn around work quickly, he is also able to offer practical solutions based on what may sometimes be high-level notions of constitutional law.”
Legal 500 Asia-Pacific 2025, Administrative and Public Law - Rising Stars
“Geoffrey is a junior of the highest calibre. His research skills are excellent and he prepares meticulously, always spotting and addressing effectively the critical issues in a case.”
Legal 500 Asia-Pacific 2024, Administrative and Public Law - Rising Stars
“Geoffrey is extremely capable in public and administrative law.”
Chambers and Partners Greater China Region Guide 2024, Administrative and Public Law - Juniors, Band 2
Geoffrey speaks English, Cantonese and Mandarin, and can read and draft in English and Chinese. He accepts instructions in all areas of Chambers’ practice.
Experience
An HKIAC arbitration
Acted as counsel (as led junior) in an HKIAC arbitration involving a 9-figure USD dispute relating to cryptocurrencies.China Shanshui Cement Group Limited & Ors v Zhang Caikui & Ors (HCA 2880/2015)
Acted for one of the defendants (a former independent non-executive director of the plaintiff company) at trial in relation to claims for unlawful means conspiracy and breach of fiduciary duties. Judgment pending. With Simon Wong.Achieve Goal Holdings Ltd v Zhong Xin Ore-Material Holding Co Ltd [2022] HKCFI 2638
Acted as sole advocate to resist an application for an anti-suit injunction following a long-running shareholders’ dispute. Tam Sze Leung & Ors v Commissioner of Police (2024) 27 HKCFAR 288
Acted for the applicants in a challenge to the legality and constitutionality of the practice of the Police in issuing ‘Letters of No Consent’ to banks regarding their dealing with suspected proceeds of crime under the Organised and Serious Crimes Ordinance (Cap 455). Led by Abraham Chan SC and with Tim Parker.Tam Sze Leung & Ors v Secretary for Justice and the Securities and Futures Commission [2022] 5 HKLRD 44 (CFI)
Acted for the applicants in judicial review proceedings against the SFC’s power to issue restriction notices under ss.204, 205 and 207(e) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap 571). Led by Jin Pao SC and with Tim Parker. Public Law / Judicial Review Infinger, Nick v Hong Kong Housing Authority [2024] HKCFA 29
Acted for the applicant in a challenge to discrimination against same-sex couples in public rental housing policies. With Tim Parker.Hong Kong Journalists Association v Commissioner for Transport [2024] HKCFI 1093
Acted for the applicant in challenging the Commissioner’s new policy on applications for Certificates of Particulars of Vehicles. Led by Nigel Kat SC and with Jeffrey Tam.Li Chiu Wah Joseph v Hong Kong Society of Notaries [2023] 1 HKC 119 (CA)
Acted for the applicant in judicial review proceedings relating to the Hong Kong Society of Notaries’ imposition of an ‘administrative charge’ on its member. Led by Martin Lee SC and Philip Dykes SC.Wong Sheun Ling v Administrative Appeals Board [2022] 4 HKC 395 (CA)
Acted for the applicant in judicial review proceedings regarding a refusal to grant a mahjong/tinkau licence under the Gambling Ordinance (Cap 148). With Tim Parker.Kwok Cheuk Kin v Secretary for Justice [2021] 3 HKLRD 140 (CA)
Acted for the applicant in a challenge to the constitutionality of the Co-location Arrangement in the West Kowloon Express Railway Station. With Ernest Ng.Hong Kong Journalists Association v Commissioner of Police [2020] 5 HKLRD 653 (CFI); [2021] 1 HKLRD 427 (CFI); CACV 645/2020
Acted for the applicant in judicial review proceedings relating to the Police’s duty to facilitate and not hinder journalistic activities at public order events, the Police’s duty to show unique identification at public order events, and the Government’s duty to have in place an independent mechanism for investigating allegations of ill-treatment. Appeal to the CA pending. Led by Philip Dykes SC and Robert Pang SC, and with Tim Parker and Albert NB Wong.Kwok Wing Hang & Ors v Chief Executive in Council (2020) 23 HKCFAR 518
Acted for the applicants in injunction and judicial review proceedings challenging the constitutionality of the Emergency Regulations Ordinance (Cap 241) and the anti-mask regulation made under it in 2019. Led by Gladys Li SC and Johannes Chan SC, and with Earl Deng, Jeffrey Tam and Allison Wong.AH v Director of Immigration (2020) 23 HKCFAR 248
Acted for the appellant in an appeal concerning the rights of out-of-time judicial review applicants to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. Led by Philip Dykes SC.MK v Government of the HKSAR (Leave to Intervene) [2019] 2 HKLRD 978 (CFI)
Acted for a transgender lesbian woman in seeking to intervene in judicial review proceedings concerning same-sex marriage and partnership. With Tim Parker. 華都大廈(高士威道)業主立案法團 v 譚建華所經營裕華皮鞋 [2021] HKDC 1475
Acted as sole advocate for the plaintiff at the District Court trial, who successfully resisted a counterclaim in adverse possession raised by an occupier in relation to certain common parts and a part of the external wall of a building.Cheung Wing Wah v On Yip Property Development Co Ltd [2021] HKCFI 156
Acted for the plaintiff at the High Court trial, who successfully claimed adverse possession of a piece of agricultural land in Lantau Island. With Randy Shek. Others HKSAR v Ng Ngoi Yee Margaret & Ors [2024] HKCFA 24
Acted for two defendants at the District Court trial and on appeal in relation to charges under the Public Order Ordinance (Cap 245) concerning an unauthorized assembly on 18 August 2019. The appeals clarified the general approach to constitutional challenges, as well as the relevance of the proportionality test in criminal trials. Led by Lawrence Lok SC and with Wing Kay Po and Simon Kwok (at trial); and led by Robert Pang SC and with Simon Kwok (on appeal).HKSAR v Choy Yuk Ling (2023) 26 HKCFAR 185
Acted for the defendant who successfully appealed against her convictions for knowingly making a statement which is false in a material particular when applying for certain Certificates of Particulars of Vehicles in the course of carrying out acts of investigative journalism. Led by Derek Chan SC and with Tien Kei Rui.Chan Yat Ling v Tang, Wong & Chow (a firm) [2022] 2 HKLRD 884 (CFI)
Acted as sole advocate for the defendant firm to resist taxation of a solicitor’s bill, concerning issues as to what constituted the ‘delivery’ of a bill under s 67 of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance (Cap 159).Chan Shu Chun v Dr Kung Yan Sum [2020] 1 HKLRD 1162 (CFI)
Acted as sole advocate for the defendant who successfully opposed an application for specific discovery, concerning issues as to what constitutes a ‘document’ as well as the relevance of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap 486) to the law on discovery.HKSAR v Chu Tsun Wai (2019) 22 HKCFAR 30
Acted for the defendant in his appeal against conviction, involving issues including whether a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on a website server constitutes criminal damage under the Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200). With Randy Shek.